Re: Does anybody else miss the CVS Monitor?

ms> Sorry. I tried. I'm too stupid for Perl. "Perl - for when life threatens to get too long." :-( Stephen> 2. The new subject line is essentially useless. Stephen> Specifically, the committer is missing, and much of the Stephen> time the tiny amount of repository information is far too Stephen> broad to be helpful. ms> I'll see what I can do. Thank you. Stephen> 4. The stable RE is going to have to pay close attention Stephen> to *both* -patches and -cvs if and when we go to Stephen> commit-without-submit on the assumption that the commit Stephen> diffs are good enough. ms> I don't see what that has to do with the format of xemacs-cvs＠ ms> at the time. It doesn't; it just is something that makes me unhappy with the direction things are apparently going. I guess in the future we will merge -cvs into -patches, at which point this should be moot---except for the fine point of getting something to attract the RE's attention into the subject line. Stephen> The rest of the stuff I can live with, but I really want Stephen> committer id in the subject, and I think it's quite Stephen> desirable to give full patches, bandwidth be damned. ms> I'm confused. Above you seem to be arguing for the opposite. ms> Supposedly, in the past, the patches would always go to ms> xemacs-patches＠ in the full anyway. But with commit-and-review, that's redundant. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.