Re: yet another XEmacs fork;-)
* Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Julian Bradfield writes:
> So for a long time I've been contemplating modifying XEmacs to be
> natively UCS and UTF-8, while also preserving perfect backward
> compatibility with the existing 21.4 way of doing things.
>
> Three weeks ago I stopped contemplating and started wasting my
> evenings (and my days off...) coding;-)
[...]
> Now, this could be a purely private project; or it could be a way
that
> either SXEmacs or XEmacs might want to consider. I'd be interested in
> the views of the XEmacs developers on this idea - especially the
> reasons why it's a really bad idea and hasn't already been done!
First, I think that SXEmacs should jump on this
We certainly want to look at it. Whether there is jumping involved or
not... can't say at this point. :-)
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 316 bytes)