From steve(a)xemacs.org Thu May 14 18:16:43 1998
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [Failure] XEmacs 21.0b40p4 (Saanen-pre4) on HPUX 9.05
X-Face:
(:YAD@JS'&Kz'M}n7eX7gEvPR6U1mJ-kt;asEc2qAv;h{Yw7ckz<7+X_SYeTNAaPui:e~x$
,A=gkt*>UPL/}\a/#C~v2%ETiAY_sx;xve0yL??JWTtX_-NUzXyP38UdW#cmN1\4(X!c3m#%IbtB-3
Z-!xpZi!`E.s{(;aP=b11"!3wQu]1j(a)^V|;n=B|{l<bZV1.AI`zWV%kPCnUhcgEe\(}/_kNd6,*3ZJ
Q3o<YQ3^u;7jS=:p0--u3msQO
X-Attribution: sb
From: SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Date: 14 May 1998 14:53:31 -0700
X-Mailing-List: <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org>
Nobu Toge <toge(a)accad1.kek.jp> writes:
[filled and edited for line length reasons]
> EMACSBOOTSTRAPLOADPATH= ...
> -o ../lib-src/DOC -d ...
> abbrev.c alloc.c blocktype.c buffer.c bytecode.c
> callint.c callproc.c casefiddle.c casetab.c
> chartab.c cmdloop.c cmds.c console.c
> console-stream.c data.c device.c dired.c doc.c
> doprnt.c dynarr.c editfns.c elhash.c emacs.c eval.c
> events.c $(extra_objs) event-stream.c extents.c
`$(extra_objs)'?
> faces.c fileio.c $(LOCK_OBJ) filemode.c floatfns.c
`$(LOCK_OBJ)'?
> fns.c font-lock.c frame.c general.c getloadavg.c
> glyphs.c glyphs-eimage.c $(gui_objs) hash.c
`$(gui_objs)'?
> imgproc.c indent.c insdel.c intl.c keymap.c
> $(RTC_patch_objs) line-number.c lread.c lstream.c
`$(RTC_patch_objs)'?
> macros.c marker.c md5.c minibuf.c objects.c opaque.c
> print.c process.c profile.c pure.c rangetab.c
> redisplay.c redisplay-output.c regex.c search.c
> $(sheap_obj) signal.c sound.c specifier.c strftime.c
`$(sheap_obj)'?
> symbols.c syntax.c sysdep.c undo.c $(x_objs)
`$(x_objs)'?
> widget.c window.c ralloc.c
> sh: syntax error at line 4: `(' unexpected
> *** Error code 2
That appears to be coming from the unsubsituted variables noted
above. They are supposed to be substituted by Make.
> ...
> At this moment I cannot even tell what this "line 4" means.
> If someone kindly gives me what to look for, perhaps I can do a bit more
> bug hunting.
Maybe it's an HP make bug. Do things work better if you do it with
GNU make?
I have seen exactly the same problem under DG/UX with an older (archaic)
version of GNU make. I'll try again with the latest.
david