Re: Liece -> Riece
Daiki Ueno <daiki(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Hi!
If you like it, I think I'll abandon `liece' package and add
`riece'
package instead.
What's the current state of the new incarnation of your package? If
you've got a buildable tarball of sources which I can import into the
package tree, send it to me (or point me to an URL), and I try to get
things running (any preferred vendor and start tags?).
I think now's a good time to start a new package, since we're early in
a new release cycle.
As has been mentioned earlier we'll keep liece around for some time to
give people a fair chance to switch over ;-) I'd suggest at least
until the first official release of riece has been created.
Whadyasay?
norbert.