Re: BAD: Handling of package-index by package release and install system

SY> |--==> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <Adrian.Aichner(a)t-online.de&gt; writes: APA> So, should we make the package-info.in files in the packages tree be APA> of type binary in CVS? SY> I have no problem with doing that. How do I do it? Hi Steve, Stephen is actively working to fix this problem. I am convinced now, that storing package-info.in files in binary form is a bad thing. Please let's not do it! Conseptually, those files are just lisp fragments. We want to be able to diff, merge, patch these. CVS cannot do this with files stored as binary files. Best regards, Adrian SY> -- SY> |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 9E7E2820>---| SY> | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | SY> | It's a way of life. | SY> |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---| -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/