Re: REMINDER: Don't dynamically link distributed executables (was Re: question about paragraph in INSTALL file)

Raymond Wiker wrote on 8-January-1999: ->Rick Campbell writes: -> > As far as I can tell, while Sun is fighting Microsoft in the public -> > arena, their technical decisions are some of the biggest reasons -> > around for switching to the dark side, er, NT. I'm not sure that even -> > HPs C++ compiler is as bad as Sun's is these days. It's really kind -> > of embarrassing to have to have a zillion backward compatibility hacks -> > so that code that works with all of the ANSI compatibility that comes -> > with Visual C++ can still deal with something as archaic as -> > Sparcworks(*). (Apologies for Off-topicness) Are you talking about Sparcworks 4.2 or the new (unreleased) 5.0? nic