Re: Mercurial "r####" numbers are not stable, use commit ids

Stephen> Your repo may not differ from the public one, but an active Stephen> developer's repo will likely be different. Would it be asking too much if active developers keep one workspace that is a mere mirror from the public one? I think I even read somewhere that that was a recommended procedure with mercurial? But I acknowledge your concern here. Using procedure to stop you from making mistakes will fail sometime. There is probably a good mercurial shot-yourself-in-the-foot joke here somewhere. Stephen> Are you sure those are the versions you tried? I think so. I cloned with -r option and used diff on the resulting files on the file system! Stephen> My changes should be in 4532:16906fefc8df because it's on the Stephen> "bytecomp" branch. And in fact a diff of 4532:16906fefc8df Stephen> against 4533:4a7c4ccac2fe shows no change. Similarly, a diff Stephen> of 4532:16906fefc8df against 4534:f32c7f843961 shows only a Stephen> trivial change. Yes, it has probably something to do with that 4532 is on the branch. I've been reading the mercurial docs but haven't got it fully yet, if possible ;-) Stephen> Note that I changed the default for fcFontName, which takes Stephen> precedence over the xftFont in the current code. Try adding Stephen> XEmacs*menubar*fcFontName: arial-6 Stephen> (I think that's the font you were using), merging with xrdb, and Stephen> restarting XEmacs. Yes that works perfectly. Thanks! My fonts are back again! Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta