Re: RFC: -- default configure to --with-mule
Sean MacLennan writes:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:23:50 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> Anybody with feelings about this, please let us know!
If with-mule becomes the default, will the xemacs-mule-sumo be rolled
into the xemacs-sumo? It seems to me that if with-mule is the default,
the "default" sumo should just work.
I'll have to think about it. For the packages the main issue is that
it's just deadweight, I think, although there *may* be some packages
that conditionally require Mule packages if they're available (rather
than when (featurep 'mule)). That would be *bad* as Alan discovered.
Not sure how that would affect us without-mule users.
Shouldn't affect you at all. You'll just have some deadweight files
under mule-packages.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta