Re: C#

R> just downloaded all the stuff on that page i think we need to R> put them all into a c mode somewhere near us Stephen> We don't "need" any junk code. It's good to set it up as packages, Stephen> but if it's not ready for prime time, we shouldn't put too much effort Stephen> into maintaining it. I'd like to see us get in touch with the Stephen> authors, see if they're willing to maintain their code as XEmacs Stephen> packages. Give them commit privileges as appropriate. Offer them Stephen> bug-reporting addresses (somebody remind me to update aliases-xemacs Stephen> at tux...). i wouldnt do it any other way stephen Stephen> What we (XEmacs) should do is document these packages in some place Stephen> users will see it. Evaluate them, at least to the extent of saying Stephen> whether they look like they'll make it out of contrib before we Stephen> release 22.0. :-) cool R> appreciated then we can include this stuff in cc-mode :) Stephen> Make a separate package, only put it in cc-mode when the cc-mode Stephen> people say it's OK. In general separate packages for separate Stephen> maintainers or separate functionality is a good thing. This is Stephen> especially important with packages that are actively maintained Stephen> upstream. yeah that was the idea at the moment -- XEmacs Advocate | Do not try the patience of Wizards, FreeBSD Devote | for they are subtle and quick to anger. Perl Hacker | - Elric (Technomage) , Babylon 5. Apache God | <mailto:rendhalver at xemacs.org> <GnuPG KeyID: AE51D190>