Re: Fix compile issues for C89 compilers.
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Jeff Sparkes writes:
> I compiled with -ansi successfully without changes. (After I fixed the
> error I had introduced.)
Does -ansi catch that error? If not, it's not very useful, I suspect.
Yes, it did.
> I didn't look at any warnings though. I just tried with -std=c89
> and it failed at line 1389 in lisp.h, which is
> DECLARE_INLINE_HEADER. It must turn off gcc extensions, wchi
> aren't standard anyway. :-)
There are also -std=g89 and -std=g99 IIRC, which permit use of GCC
extensions.
Let's pick one and add it to configure, and never see this problem
again! I like -ansi for historical reasons. I remember using to enable
the latest features. :-)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta