"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Hi!
No. In fact, that's why we provide a GNUmakefile, so that the
real
Makefile can be pure of GNU-isms. If you can identify what part of
the Makefile is not portable, we'd appreciate it.
Okay, I look into it.
Note that we _do_ require GNU make for the packages.
Yes, I know that.
norbert.