Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH and --rpath ***please read***
nbecker(a)fred.net writes:
I understand that if someone moves the libraries we could feel
somewhat justified in saying that he gets what he deserves (I'm not
necessarily saying that I agree with this point of view). But the
same problem can occur if you build the binary in one environment and
then install it into another.
Right, which is why you should use static linking if you want
portable binaries. I don't think portable binaries is a problem
we ought to be trying to solve in the same sentence as dynamic
linking.