Re: Should XEmacs look for "./poe.el" on the load-path?

Stephen> What do you mean by "fixing"? I know what _I_ like, but Stephen> treating "./bar" as relative to `default-directory' but Stephen> "foo/bar" as relative to the path is pretty inconsistent. ms> I personally don't think so. As this discussion showed, it ms> depends on your intuition whether "." is absolute or relative. SJT> Negotiate with Martin. I consider my intuition here unreliable, and SJT> can't afford time to think carefully; I abstain. Status quo wins SJT> ties. Or we can revisit it after the release, and I _will_ think SJT> about it then. I didn't actually express an opinion, only cause for doubt. In any case, changing this before 21.2 seems clearly wrong. having "./foo" treated differently from "mule/foo" seems wrong. Especially if GNU Emacs does it the way we do it currently, we shouldn't change this behavior.