Re: 2000-10-15: http://xemacs.sourceforge.net/ featuring XHTML 1.0 now
Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
PSGML as such is a very complex, highly accurate heuristic; that's
why
its validate option uses an external program. Obviously, we should too.
Actually, come to think of it, doesn't PSGML use SP for validation? That's
what both the WDG and W3C Validators are built around so the output should
be the same. Are we absolutely positive that some warnings aren't getting
lost somewhere in the automation logic?
--
As a cat owner, I know this for a fact...
Nothing says "I love you" like a decapitated gopher on your front porch.