Re: Bug in many .texi files

Klaus> This form and some others are also contained in Texinfo Klaus> files at places which aren't intended as cross-refence or Klaus> menu. If we change the definition of a cross-reference, Klaus> this might have an influence on the probability and the Klaus> extent of such false cross-references. Agreed. But I don't really care about that, even if they fool automatic validators. The real problem is (if I understand correctly) node names of the form "Sugar, spice, and everything nice" will be truncated to "Sugar" by Yoshiki's patch, and probably not referenced correctly. Is that true? If so, Yoshiki's patch should not be applied, and we should fix the Texinfo sources instead. (I can see easy workarounds for uses of period in node names, but not for this use of comma.) Klaus> (cond ((string-match "XEmacs" (emacs-version)) Klaus> (defun Info-navigate () (Info-follow-nearest-node (point)))) Klaus> (t Klaus> (defun Info-navigate () (Info-follow-nearest-node)))) Yuck! Do we need this gratuitous difference in this function? Shouldn't we make the argument optional and default to point? -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."