Re: rx
Andreas Röhler writes:
Thus, while delivering some enhancement for the advertised
programmer,
What enhancement? AFAICS it's a subset. If you're going to have
something that verbose, why not use a real parser and a LALR(1)
language at least?
What's the advantage to a new runtime language (as opposed to a
composition helper like re-builder)?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta