Re: Splitting packages

|--==> "VS" == Ville Skytt <Ville> writes: VS> Ok, I'm willing to start slowly splitting packages into smaller, more VS> closely-related chunks. I've seen many messages about this saying that VS> people have not had time to do it in the past. VS> The first ones in my list would be splitting python, perl and ruby stuff VS> out from prog-modes, since these involve multiple files in a single-file VS> package. VS> I'm thinking about the naming of this kind of packages, and suggest VS> foo-support as the template. Like this: VS> ruby-support: ruby-mode.el* inf-ruby.el* rubydb3x.el* (not in CVS yet) VS> python-support: python-mode.el* pydoc* VS> perl-support: cperl-mode.el perl-mode.el This seems like a good plan to me. And I like your "foo-mode" naming scheme better. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|