David Kastrup writes:
When you tell that to Stephen, he will use any of a variety of
excuses all of which don't hold water, and all of which he will not
actually defend when you point out why they don't hold water.
Instead he'll bring up something different which does not hold
water either.
My sole contention all along has been that the package tarball is not
the derived work described by the GPL, and that the executable
libraries and data require only common OS utilities and XEmacs to work
on them, in a standard way (cp the data, M-x byte-compile-file for the
libraries). It's that simple.
That is not the way to address a problem.
There is no problem, except convincing you that you are wrong.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta