Ar an t-aonú lá déag de mí Feabhra, scríobh Marcus Harnisch:
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> writes:
> My idea was that it might reduce the dumped size a little if we used seven
> bits per octet in the generated symbol name, instead of formatting the
> current value of *gensym-counter* as a decimal as we do now.
> With all seven bits per char:
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aidan admin 3535640 10 Feb 22:37 src/xemacs.dmp
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aidan admin 3536052 10 Feb 22:34 src/xemacs.dmp
-------
-412
Are you sure that the savings justify the added complexity?
I’m sure that they don’t, Marcus, which is why I am not planning to make the
change. As the biologists say, a negative result is still a result, so I
posted with the information despite that.
--
¿Dónde estará ahora mi sobrino Yoghurtu Nghe, que tuvo que huir
precipitadamente de la aldea por culpa de la escasez de rinocerontes?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta