Re: [Wolfram Gloger <wmglo@dent.med.uni-muenchen.de>] more on the emacs-

Jan> Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)arthur.rhein-neckar.de&gt; writes: Jan> That's probably 21.1p2. The reason you don't see it is that on Jan> glibc2.x systems XEmacs uses the system malloc instead of its own doug Jan> lea allocator. The main reason for this is that we don't run into Jan> obscure and hard to debug problems like this. I'm confused. The system malloc in glibc 2.x *is* doug lea malloc. I helped getting it working for XEmacs. Nevertheless I've seen another message that the fix I've send is not optimal (should crash if MALLOC_CHECK_ is set) and therefore shouldn't be applied. I'll keep you updated. Jan > From glancing at the patch in its current incarnation, Jan> it seems awfully glibc specific to me. If I understand it correctly. Jan> It works because the glibc startup code works by calling this hook Jan> somewhere. That's right. Jan> Who says the Solaris startup code will do that? Solaris doesn't use doug lea malloc - or has somebody added general support for it in XEmacs in the meantime? Jan> P.S. Why does Glibc 2.1.x define I_SETSIG ? AFAIK because it's part of the required interface of <stropts.h> - but all stream functions set errno to ENOSYS. If you think this is a bug, send a bugreport via glibcbug or the www interface at <http://www-gnats.gnu.org:8080/cgi-bin/wwwgnats.pl>;. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a)arthur.rhein-neckar.de jaeger(a)informatik.uni-kl.de for pgp-key finger ajaeger(a)aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de