Re: What to do with modules now ...
At 21:43 10/01/99 -0800, Kyle Jones wrote:
I don't see that it is. There hasn't been any clamor for
dynamic
loading of the X11 code for instance, and it would be quite a job
to implement. It's hard to believe that the bug count would
decrease as a result of this, either.
I still think the biggest win would be dynamic loading of natively compiled
lisp. But that probably also requires Kyles portable undumper and we've
already agreed it might be difficult. I agree with Kyle breaking of chunks
like X is going to result in a lot of bugs.
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp