Re: RCS
Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
>>>>> "APA" == Adrian Aichner
<adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
[snip]
> Uwe, I use
> M-x erevision
> in version controlled files and it works well with old and new vc.
Ah good point that indeed work without hazzle
So, you have at least two uncorrupted versions of the files.
Try
M-x erevision RET REV RET RET
to ediff revision REV with the current version and report back.
>>
>> For me it is not clear how is the culprit here. Maybe my version file
>> corrected but then all of my older files should be corrupted which I
>> find extremely odd.
> Do some command-line testing as suggested before by Ville.
> Apparently there's no authoritative online version of the rcs man
> pages, but
> http://www.delorie.com/gnu/docs/rcs/co.1.html
> should be good enough for your testing.
> co -pREV FILE
> will print revision REV of file FILE to stdout.
Ok it does not work neither, that is I have 130 versions of that file
You can do better than that, Uwe :-)
- What happened.
- What you thought should have happened.
- Precisely what you were doing at the time.
and can only visit the first 4 all other are reported as absent.
What does
C-x v l runs the command vc-print-log
report in any of the files under RCS?
On the command-line, what does
rlog FILE
report?
So I conclude that somehow the version file ,v is corrupted. What
I hope not.
Are these text files (which EOL coding?) or binary files?
Adrian
really puzzles me that this seems to hold for ALL version controlled
files.
So it seems not so much a xemacs problem but it is an extremely odd
thing
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrianï¼ xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta