Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
Uh, my bad, I didn't look close enough. But that's not
really a
problem, we've got plenty of numbers to spare and a new release is
made in a couple of minutes :-)
Well, it was probably my bad for not just bumping it myself. I wasn't
sure what the convention was. And I wouldn't be so complacent about
having plenty of numbers if I were you. Phil on sci.math says that
there are only a finite number of natural numbers. We might run out!
:-)
--
Jerry James
http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~james/