Re: Kill M-x

J> One line of thought: J> Have you unbound execute-extended-command from M-x? Maybe instead of J> M-x, it should be using the "translate function to keyboard binding" J> feature that appears in various places (substitute-command-keys J> "\\[indent-region]"). Even if you got the prompt technically accurate, telling the user what she just typed would be less useful than telling the user what sort of thing to type next. `execute' is a standard key on AIX machines. J> On a parallel note, substitute-command-keys also has M-x hardcoded: J> M-x global-set-key M-e extended-execute-command J> M-x global-set-key M-x kill-buffer J> M-: (substitute-command-keys "\\[find-library]") J> Says "M-x find-library", thought it is really not M-x find-library. J> Maybe (substitute-command-keys "\\[execute-extended-command]") should J> say "M-x" (or "M-e" here). J> Weird: (substitute-command-keys "\\[execute-extended-command]") says J> "execute". Sure enough, the "execute" key is bound to that function. J> Is that a real key? J> So, maybe execute-extended-command could use substitute-command-keys, J> and then it would say "M-x" or "M-e" or "F9" or "execute"? Of course, these should all be fixed.