Re: about obsolete packages

stephen> NB: xemacs-design currently doesn't exist---please direct traffic to stephen> xemacs-beta. Once the new ML system gets settled, we can revive stephen> -design if people think it's needed. stephen> Didier Verna writes: stephen> AUCTeX is a special case. David has been extremely stephen> uncooperative and has been mildly abusive toward Uwe stephen> Brauer who volunteered to maintain the XEmacs package. If stephen> Uwe wishes to drop the package, that's fine by me. stephen> However, I find the XEmacs package very useful for my stephen> personal needs, and others do too. Hello Is seems that the XEmacs-beta list is back. Sorry that I missed earlier posts. I agree with Stephen: auctex needs to be updated, however sadly this is more complicated than I thought due to large reorganisation of auctex (including preview latex etc). I know should have done this some time ago, (my workload does not allow it). I might try it again in the coming days and would like to encourage everyone to overtake the management. On the other hand I have *not* received a massive demand for the upgrade. And even at its present form auctex is _useful_. So I would vote *against* its removal from SUMO. Uwe Brauer _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta