On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 10:08, Adrian Aichner wrote:
>> The XEmacs packages need to be placed more prominently
on the XEmacs
>> website relative to those external packages.
Ville> +1
Ville> Hmm, how about if we didn't use the term "packages" on the
Ville> website for anything else but XEmacs packages? The current
That's a good suggestion!
Ville> "Elisp packages" could become "Elisp resources" or
Ville> something.
I would like to get "external" or "unpackaged" in there.
How about "Unpackaged Elisp" or "External Elisp"?
IMHO, both of these, especially "unpackaged" is misleading, since the
page contains lots of stuff that actually /is/ available as XEmacs
package(s). I'd still prefer "Elisp Resources" over these...
Hmm, this availability should also be marked in this
whatever-it-shall-be-called page somehow. I'll send a patch.
--
\/ille Skyttä