In article <871w4bmc3o.fsf(a)uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>multipart/mixed
> text/plain, charset=us-ascii
> text/x-patch, charset=us-ascii, content-disposition=inline
> text/plain, charset=us-ascii
>application/pgp-signature
>
>`vm-reply-include-text' and `vm-followup-include-text' parse it
>incorrectly. They leave you in a buffer with only the first
>text/plain part included and quoted. The second text/plain part
>should definitely be included and quoted, and I would argue that the
>text/x-patch part should be included and quoted because it has
>content-disposition "inline", so the author expected it to be
>displayable.
FWIW, Gnus quotes all parts for an article with this structure:
<* mixed>
<1 text>
<2 x-patch> (inline)
<3 text>
BTW, there's neither a In-Reply-To nor a References header in Julian's
article. A VM bug?
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available |
http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta