Re: Python mode failures with xemacs
>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Really?
I said in theory ;-) In practice you can use what ever method works
based on conventions etc. In theory: Preprocessing and search paths
for files and modules really requires close to compilation to give
proper support.
I think that a feature that approximates intellisense can be
implemented with only local knowledge of the buffer,
Maybe we are talking about different things. Intellisense to me is
autocompletion related functionality that is supplied from outside the
buffer. Such as the parameter list of a function, defined elsewhere,
you are just writing a call to.
Have you been following the CEDET controversy on emacs-devel?
No. What is the controversy about? Something that will influence an
upgrade of CEDET in the packages?
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta