mark-end-of-buffer

Uwe Brauer writes: It's not complicated. The computation is quite straightforward. The reason for the additional computation is that our version accepts an additional argument that does something useful, and GNU's doesn't. I use the feature occasionally in TTYs. No. The comment about overflow is simply saying that it's worth being careful to do the computation (N * (BUFFERSIZE / 10)) rather than ((N * BUFFERSIZE) / 10), because the multiplication in the latter can overflow and the format can't. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta