Re: Could people test out the gtk-xemacs-21-2 branch?
Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>>> "WMP" == William M Perry
<wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes:
WMP> Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>> Index: src/glyphs.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs/src/glyphs.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.23.2.93.2.1
>> diff -u -w -r1.23.2.93.2.1 glyphs.c
>> --- src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 03:59:59 1.23.2.93.2.1
>> +++ src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 07:27:20
>> ＠＠ -46,7 +46,7 ＠＠
>> #include "specifier.h"
>> #include "window.h"
>>
>> -#ifdef HAVE_XPM && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
>> +#if defined (HAVE_XPM) && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
>> #include <X11/xpm.h>
>> #endif
WMP> Thanks martin... I'm just very confused how the !＠#%!＠ this built on my
WMP> machine here.
The above was merely a warning ... trailing garbage in directive...
Read your compiler warnings!
I need to make some changes to the default flags that have started being
used in 21.2 - the -Wmissing-prototypes and -Wshadow flags make the GTK
headers spew out approximately 1 googleplex[1] of warnings per file. *sigh*
I've removed those from my local workspace, and am scanning the warnings
here - already found a few nasty ones. The change in the GC stuff (no
markobj function passed now) royally ＠!#%!＠ed me in a few places where I
forgot to make the change. :)
-bp
[1] This is Liam's new favorite number, so we've been discussing it quite a
bit... Wheee! :)