Hi.
First off, either the mailing list gateway, or perhaps your
mail client, jammed an extra carraige-return between the
wrapped lines of your X-Face header. Thus the start of the
message (which is separated from the headers by the first blank
line) was found after the first X-Face line, which really upset
my fetchmail daemon. Anybody know where this bug is coming
from?
As for my difficulties with the netinstaller, it failed for me
this morning with
ftp.xemacs.org, and it barfed last week with
ftp.sunsite.utk.edu (or something close to that) and
ftp.stealth.org.
I'm happy to provide any more detailed feedback. I've attached
"setup.log.full" from my most recent failed attempt.
Thanks,
-Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: None
To: Matthew Eldridge
Cc: xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org; Andy Piper
Subject: Re: XEmacs 21.4.5 'Civil Service' is released.
c/qi;YLwRmEbt8Y*=j5n(urqY@chPh@J'D"QlqD!C8>*}#kYF[-tYl3VZga/HSOP|K,{L
Rtu@f0y/=O&Cu}\:~d|P$JON?pn?j,&CnPb1z#/TL9bkAJwyol&a:SvYj-VYbM=Dtxhk9
=w|R6U3_;SH&B<Mfy6Q%#
X-Attribution: APA
From: Adrian.Aichner(a)t-online.de (Adrian Aichner)
Organization: The XEmacs Project
Date: 29 Oct 2001 19:40:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <15325.37541.508938.2012(a)hp4.t-ram.com>
Message-ID: <n12ae1cm.fsf(a)ecf.teradyne.com>
Lines: 84
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil
Service (candidate 1))
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Sender: 520002458184-0001(a)t-dialin.net
Return-Path: Adrian.Aichner(a)t-online.de
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2001 18:40:39.0384 (UTC)
FILETIME=[34C04580:01C160A9]
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Eldridge <eldridge(a)t-ram.com>
writes:
Hi Matthew!
Matthew> Andy Piper writes:
>> * XEmacs 21.4.5 "Civil Service (Windows)" is released.
"Civil
>> Service (Windows)" is the sixth in the OXYMORON series.
>>
>> The binaries for both cygwin and native MS-Windows are
>> available via the XEmacs netinstaller which can be found at
>>
http://www.xemacs.org/Download/win32/setup.exe This version of
>> the installer is 1.2.2.11.2.3.
Matthew> The idea of a netinstaller is nice. Unfortunately, to
Matthew> really work well the download process has to be an
Matthew> absolute rock. Since XEmacs isn't a microsoft product,
Matthew> and nobody is paying for huge gobs of bandwidth from
Matthew> conxion or akamai or anybody else to provide excellent
Matthew> accessibility, the net installer tends to fall flat on
Matthew> its face.
People on xemacs-beta: Please report successful installations via
netinstaller.
It has worked nicely for me a while ago.
Matthew> First it starts by giving me a list of 50 places to do
Matthew> the download from. I have *no* idea which of them are
Matthew> topologically close to me, likely to offer a fast
Matthew> download, etc. So I get out a ping tool and hunt around
Matthew> see what it looks like I've got a good connection to.
Matthew> Then I bravely tell the netinstaller the site I've
Matthew> chosen.
Matthew> It then grinds for a little before presenting me with a
Matthew> list of packages. I can't tell if "all" is selected by
Matthew> default, but I guess that it is. There's no "Select All"
Matthew> button, so I hit "next" and proceed.
Matthew> The netinstaller then throws up a dialog box informing me
Matthew> it can't find a package (ada support I think). So I hit
Matthew> the "okay" button. Then it tells me it can't find
Matthew> another package (auctex I think), so I hit the okay
Matthew> button. And this continues, ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
What's the site you have chosen?
Matthew> Given this irritation, I'd like to make a request. All I
Matthew> want to be able to do is connect to a site (or one of 50
Matthew> sites, whatever) with either http or ftp, and download a
Matthew> single big honking file (probably 30MB or thereabouts)
Matthew> which is a self-contained installer for *everything*. I
Matthew> can spare the extra 20MB of disk space for the features
Matthew> I'll never use or even know exist. And this would
Matthew> eliminate the netinstaller which, at least for me, has
Matthew> thus far never worked.
How often/when has you tried?
Matthew> After all that ranting, I'd like to say that XEmacs is
Matthew> tremendous, and I'm extremely thankful that people care
Matthew> enough to make the large effort so that it runs natively
Matthew> on windows.
We depend heavily on detailed technical feedback.
That's the way you "pay" for your XEmacs.
Best regards,
Adrian
Matthew> Thanks,
Matthew> -Matthew
Matthew> --
Matthew> Matthew Eldridge, 408/453-8726 x206
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrian@xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/