|--==> "JZ" == Jamie Zawinski <jwz(a)jwz.org> writes:
JZ> Steve Youngs wrote:
>
>Does `(setq inhibit-clash-detection t)' give you what you need?
JZ> Yes, thanks.
You're welcome.
JZ> Never in a million years would I have found that, since it does
JZ> not have "lock" in its name, and the messages do not use the
JZ> word "clash".
The only reason I found it was because I can remember configuring with
'--with-clash-detection'. Someone not building their own XEmacs
(Redhat people who use RPMs?) would have a hell of a time tracking
this down.
I think Jamie makes a very valid point here, that variable name blows
goats. Yes, the name does correctly describe what it does, but you'd
only find it if you were familiar with XEmacs' configuration options.
I propose a name change (or at least a defvaralias) to
`inhibit-file-locking'.
And perhaps the warning message could be prepended with "Clash
detected:".
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au>---|