Re: Really weird `disabled-command-hook' bug
Nix <nix(a)esperi.demon.co.uk> writes:
So I tried sticking a new function onto `disabled-command-hook'.
It didn't work; it wasn't called at all.
[..]
Yet call it `disabled-command-hook' and bingo.
I profess puzzlement.
Congratulations: You have reached the next stage of enlightenment, you
have rediscovered the disabled-command-hook-only-works-if-called-that
bug. Only few have gone before. [1]
Weird, is it? I had a go ad fixing it 2 years ago but failed then.
I will have another try.
Jan
Footnotes:
[1] Maybe somebody put it in as "so you think you are no
longer a novice?"-test?