Re: 21.4.14 Linking Question
Vin Shelton <acs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Vin Shelton <acs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>
>> I don't know how up-to-date the information is. Some people have
>> the (crazy, I think) idea that unexec will eventually go away.
>
> Why crazy? The whole idea behind the portable dumper is to get rid of
> unexec.
I would drop my objections to pdump if the entire thing were one
file.
Isn't the entire dump already in one file? Or do you by one file mean
"xemacs executable only"?
Personally I still prefer Kyle's original proposal of "dumping" C
code and linking against it as part of the XEmacs build process (which
would be *really* portable), but I could live with the current pdump
architecture as well.