>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> From 1997 to 2000 or so most NEWS was written and edited by
Hrvoje
Stephen> Niksic. Before that, I think Steve Baur. Before that, probably
Chuck
Stephen> Thompson, and then before that, the Lucid people. You can ignore
Stephen> anything before the demise of Lucid, though; all Lucid stuff was
Stephen> assigned to the FSF, sez Jamie.
OK. So an outline for the copyright would be
Copyright 19ZZ,...,19YY FSF
Copyright 19YY,...,19XX Chuck Thompson
Copyright 19XX,...,1997 Steve Baur
Copyright 1997,...,2000 Hrvoje Niksic
Stephen> hg log should have reasonably good logs back to The Great Trunk Move
Stephen> around 21.5.0. Before that, practically everything gets attributed to
Stephen> Mike, unfortunately, until you get back to betas for 21.0.
Copyright 2000,2001 Michael Sperber
hg log indicates 8 commits since 2001 if it can be trusted. We then
get:
Copyright 2001 Ben Wing
Copyright 2001 Didier Verna
Copyright 2004 Stephen Turnbull
Copyright 2005, 2006 Aidan Kehoe
Stephen> Yes. I have a copy (or a dozen) around on various machines.
Stephen> If you have need send me an ssh key,
What do you think. Is the list good enough? (Give than the years are
sorted out.) or do we really need to analyse the commits in cvs?
>>>> Michael Sperber <sperber(a)deinprogramm.de>
writes:
Michael> As to NEWS, I'd suggest treating it like ChangeLog. (Well,
there's
Michael> nothing from GNU Emacs in there, is there?)
Michael: Are you suggesting a more relaxed notation that just say that
the copyright is held by the authors but without actually mentioning
them by name.
Finally about the license: With these contributors listed above would
there be any issue with making the NEWS files GPLv3 or later?
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta