Re: [VETO] Revert buffer patch
yup, that's exactly what my original proposal concerned.
are you in agreement with it?
Andy Piper wrote:
At 02:28 AM 11/16/2001 -0700, Ben Wing wrote:
>egad, stephen :-). you're way out in left field here. this [hopefully]
>isn't
>anything like what andy had in mind, and it's total overkill. see my last
>posting about optimizations in insert-file-contents for reverting buffers with
>few changes; imho that is already somewhat of an overkill.
Lets back up a bit here, I am only trying to hit the sweet spot of
reverting buffers with NO changes.
andy