Re: [Bug: 21.5-b31] list* not defined when including defsubst in subr.el.
Ar an fichiú lá de mí Aibréan, scríobh Malcolm Purvis:
[...] Are defsubst definitions allowed in subr.el? I'm in the
process of
porting looking-at-p from GNU Emacs, and that is where they put the
definition.
It was never a policy decision. I put #'list* in subr.el for a year (and
that would have prevented this error); I moved it to cl.el on the reasoning
that we require cl for almost everything and maintenance would be a little
easier with it in the same file as it is in all the other emacs versions. It
would be perfectly cromulent to put it back in subr.el .
Loading bytecomp-runtime.el...
Loading subr.el...*** Error in XEmacs initialization
(void-function list*)
*** Backtrace
really-early-error-handler((void-function list*))
[...]
(proclaim-inline mp-foo)
--
‘Iodine deficiency was endemic in parts of the UK until, through what has been
described as “an unplanned and accidental public health triumph”, iodine was
added to cattle feed to improve milk production in the 1930s.’
(EN Pearce, Lancet, June 2011)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta