Re: XEmacs and GPLv3

Kean Johnston <jkj(a)sco.com&gt; writes: > Actually my preference would be to have it read "GPL V2 or later" to > give people the opportunity to use GPL v2 which I understand, versus > GPL v3 which I don't fully yet. If that is acceptable please consider > this my formal permission to license it under GPL v2 or later. If you > insist on it being "GPL v3 or later" I will need to read the new GPL > more carefully to ensure it protects freedoms I want protected. It is nonsensical to pretend to permit releasing "GPL v2 or later" while barring a release as "GPL v3 or later", since "GPL v3 or later" is covered by "GPL v2 or later".