lispref structure really confused (was Re: [Bug: xemacs-beta tip] tables of contents at wrong end manual)

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Samuel Bronson <naesten(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Hmm, it looks like there are worse problems, at least in lispref: the sectioning hierarchy doesn't match the node next/previous/up links doesn't match the node menu structure. I realize there's no reason that all three trees need to be identical, but this seems ridiculous: some nodes are even given in a *different order* in the menu structure and in the next/previous/up links! I'd like to straighten this out a bit; any hints as to how to tell which order/structure(s) to keep? One other thing I've noticed: usually, when I try "C-h C-f", it says that whatever I was looking for is missing from the index, but when the .texi file has a perfectly-good looking ＠defun (or similar) in it. Am I wrong in thinking that ＠defun is supposed to put the function described into the function index, or is something just mysteriously broken? _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta