Re: [FAILED] XEmacs 21.2.15
>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
sb> Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes in
sb> xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
> Would there be a way to guard better against that. When 21.2 is
> released surely there are bound to be users upgrading the
> packages in the same way?
sb> Actually, 21.1 isn't incompatible in this fashion, Stephen and
sb> the others were using pre-21.0-final mule-base packages
Confirm.
But this is still going to bite some people; all we can really do
about it is put it in the FAQ. You could make shadows involving core
Lisp a fatal build error, I guess, and I believe we check that before
dumping anyway.
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
What are those two straight lines for? "Free software rules."