Re: Future of XEmacs

>>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: > Of course. But remember what started this thread: a developer who > was having trouble using XEmacs with the packages he wanted. Well, introducing new packages can really trigger a lot of things that we don't have support for. So that is good to do! > [...] Most of the actual development work I've done on XEmacs has > been to fix *shit* ported from GNU Emacs hastily, [...] Well, I'm just suggesting upgrading as a tool to drive the development. Each problem should be solved appropriately. Some times a rewrite is the right thing and sometimes adding functionality to the core is needed. Yours