Re: autex-11.87 and the package hir.
Uwe Brauer writes:
>> "Michael" == Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)deinprogramm.de> writes:
> Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
> Could you
> delete the above file (it's generated) as a stopgap measure and try
> again?
After deleting the official auctex pkg, xemacs seems to correctly
recognize the one sitting in my home directory.
You didn't have to delete the whole package, just the auto-autoloads.*
files and the custom-load.* files. (In fact renaming them by
prefixing "saved-" or something like that would work.) This still
isn't 100% safe, but you're probably OK if you restart XEmacs.
Oh oh this is not good and might surprise more than one. Till it is
fixed maybe we should say something about it in the documentation
(web page?)
We do. "Shadowed packages are bad because you can get inconsistent
results. Choose one, move the rest out of your load-path (or delete
them)."
You also used a fake package from AUCTeX. I suspect it doesn't
conform to XEmacs format, so there's no reason at all to expect it to
work properly. See my response to Michael.
Steve
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta