On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 05:59, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Ville> But I don't think that patch does The Right Thing.
The
Ville> patch unconditionally removes *menubar*Font entries in
Ville> Emacs.ad, which I think will screw people not building
Ville> --with-xfs. As long as RH is building --with-xfs, they can
Ville> safely apply it.
Ah, OK. Just uncomment the menubar*FontSet part. If --with-xfs=no,
XEmacs totally ignores FontSet resources. If --with-xfs=yes, XEmacs
prefers the FontSet resource, then falls back to the Font resource.
Ie, the #ifdef'ing is done by XEmacs resource management. ;-)
Allright, neat. The patch has just appeared in xemacs-patches.
Ville> :/ I've been working a bit with the spec file for
the RPM
Ville> they have in rawhide, and as of now, AFAICT all my fixes to
Ville> it have been applied (except for upgrading to 21.4.9) in
Ville> the latest RPM, 21.4.8-16 (not at
ftp.redhat.com yet).
It's not the sanity of their XEmacs that's at issue. Although I rant
about them and Mandrake, it's free software. They can and should do
what they like---as long as they don't ask _us_ to support _their_ users.
Agreed, but I'm afraid they don't have to ask. At least some of their
users will just ask us directly :/ We benefit from distros providing
better XEmacsen too.
--
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at
xemacs.org