"Eric M. Ludlam" <zappo(a)ultranet.com> writes:
>>> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> seems to think
that:
>Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
>
>> >2) I don't see any particular use in changing the default pointers for
>> > speedbar frame, but since it was done in FSF Emacs, I figured that
>> > it should be done in XEmacs too. So the "I don't see the value
of
>> > these three" comment is mine. If Eric agrees, we might want to
>> > remove them altogether.
>>
>> I would tend towards this. I would like to see this particular UI
>> metaphor applied globally to XEmacs on Windows since it is one that
>> users are used to with web browsers (and looks much better
>> IMHO). Either way it should probably be provided as a global
>> customize option rather than specific to speedbar.
>
>OK. I think this is Eric's call to make. Eric?
My call to decide XEmacs' global mouse cursor metaphore?
No, your call to decide whether speedbar should specify this stuff
explicitly in its frames. I think it's not really needed.
I think it is not needed.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is
probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners.