>>>> "Karl" == Karl Kleinpaste
<karl(a)justresearch.com> writes:
Karl> You're entitled to any opinion you wish to hold, and I'm
Karl> entitled to mine, but let's just make it bloody damn clear
Karl> that it is *you* who are farting around with default
Karl> behavior that has existed in Emacs for something like 15
Karl> years, all in the name of pseudo-"progress" embodied by the
Karl> Keymap Purity Hit Squad.
It's _not_ "pseudo"-progress. I beta-test a Japanized Linux
distribution with about 5 xterm variants and 4 different console maps,
my students use Windose, some of my colleagues use Macs, the institute
used to run Suns and now has a DEC OSF/1 system with the terminals
being Solaris/386, and I'm sick and tired of never being really sure
what some of the keys are going to do in the various and sundry
terminal emulators and system consoles that I occasionally run XEmacs
on. And I especially don't like having to trace uncorrect behavior
through twisty trails to find out whether it's XEmacs, a patch to the
terminal emulator, or a too-tricky terminfo entry.
I agree that it's not unadulterated progress if it alters correct
historical behavior, but just because some people are fortunate enough
to have that doesn't mean all of us are all the time. A successful
systematization of this mess is justifiably called "progress."
By the way, why all the heat? 21.2 is an early beta, we have the CVS
diffs, we can rebuild 20.4 (and it won't even cost $6 million).
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
What are those two straight lines for? "Free software rules."