Mike Kupfer writes:
I don't mind it being unreadable, I just mind the misleading
"size"
keyword.
It's not misleading, it's ambiguous. I suspect the main reason you
think anything else would be better is because you were bit by this
one, and won't make the mistake with any other keyword because of
that. But the alternatives are just as ambiguous or non-descriptive:
The only other proposal I can think of would be to drop the
"size"
keyword entirely.
Make it more cryptic as a warning to the naive? That might work.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta