Darryl Okahata <darrylo(a)sr.hp.com> writes:
Well, would the following patch help? I submitted it back in
March, but it never made it into the source tree (and I didn't get any
feedback why it was bad).
I have the original patch still ticked, btw.
I responded at the time:
sb> I haven't had time to look this over. If it is fixing the way XEmacs
sb> treats "~/" specially in the package path it needs to be deferred past
sb> integration of the package path cleanup (which won't be in b31).
I'd recommend [re]submitting it to xemacs-patches. It looks like it
could be O.K. but it probably should be tested first.