Re: OK, browse-url-kfm works (sortof)
nbecker(a)fred.net writes:
I don't know - how do you all feel? I can understand that
browse-url-??? is getting too crowded, and maybe some would rather
not add kfm.
No matter how crowded it was, *removing* features the users depended
on without explanation is not excusable. browse-url-kfm should go
back. If it's crowded, then it should be proclaimed obsolete (with a
warning that warns of the "correct" usage) and removed several years
from now.