Re: doxymacs

Andrew> I don't have "right of veto", but (IMHO) idea of packaging Andrew> of doxygen's binary with doxymacs (or any another major or Andrew> minor mode) should be vetoed. I see. So should we remove etags and movemail? I think doxygen is quite analogous to etags, although more complex. And etags is in the core. It all depends on how much work the maintainer wants to do. If someone wants to maintain a doxygen.el package, and supply doxygen with it, and address the problems of ensuring the necessary dependencies are present on user machines, I don't see a problem with that. If it's that tough, then we'll have problems finding a maintainer willing to do the work. So this will veto itself. If it doesn't, as far as we're concerned it's just some more disk space. As far as users are concerned, doxygen.el is useless without doxygen, so they won't install the package if they're unwilling to install the dependencies. Am I missing something? -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."