Re: Future package: proposed content
Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> writes:
I propose that the future package contain one future-x.el file for
each
x.el file containing a future function. For two of the functions I am
interested in, that would mean a future-subr.el file. We should also
have a core.el or future-core.el file for changes in core. That would
take care of the third function I'm concerned with.
What do you think?
From my point of view this sounds like a good approach. If nobody
else objects to the idea, send me the file(s) you already have for
this package and I try to get them packed up and distributed.
norbert.